| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Published online before print February 14, 2008
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Freiburg, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, the human enzyme that replicates mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA).1
Decreased mtDNA copy numbers result in an impaired synthesis of mtDNA-encoded respiratory chain subunits and a secondary defect of oxidative phosphorylation.2,3
Many organs can be involved.1,4
The mitochondrial toxicity of NRTIs in the liver has been associated with steatosis, steatohepatitis, and acute organ failure and probably also contributes to the hyperlactatemia and lactic acidosis that continues to be a problem in resource-poor settings.5-11 By exposing hepatocytes and adipocytes to pyrimidine NRTI in vitro, we have recently discovered that uridine prevents and even reverses the mitochondrial toxicity of these antiretrovirals.12,13 In mice, a dietary supplement with a high bioavailability of uridine was shown to prevent zalcitabine-induced microvesicular steatohepatitis.6 In humans, uridine is well tolerated.14 Several clinical trials currently investigate the dietary supplementation of uridine in the prevention of NRTI-related side effects (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). The first results are promising.15-17
The mechanism of the protective effects of uridine has not been fully delineated.14
Severe mtDNA depletion and secondary respiratory chain dysfunction is thought to diminish the availability of intracellular pyrimidines, because a normal electron flux through the respiratory chain is required for the activity of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), an enzyme that is essential for pyrimidine de novo synthesis.18
Intramitochondrial pyrimidine deficiency could then induce or contribute to an even more profound mtDNA-depletion by allowing the triphosphorylated pyrimidine antiretrovirals to compete more efficiently with their natural pyrimidine counterparts at polymerase-
. Exogenous uridine supplementation may disrupt this vicious circle by replenishing intracellular pyrimidine pools distal from DHODH through the salvage pathway.14
Alternatively uridine (or its metabolites) may compete with antiretroviral nucleoside prodrugs either at carriers permitting their intramitochondrial import, or at enzymes responsible for their intracellular activation.19
The aim of our study was to better characterize the mechanism of the beneficial effects of uridine on hepatocytes and to more specifically examine, if pyrimidine depletion does indeed contribute to the mitochondrial toxicity by sensitizing for the adverse effects of pyrimidine analogues. We therefore examined the toxic effects of stavudine in hepatocytes that were co-incubated with or without redoxal, an agent that induces pyrimidine depletion by directly and specifically blocking DHODH (Figure 1)
.20,21
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human hepatoma HepG2 cell line was provided by the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD (no. HB-8065). Cell culture flasks (75 cm2) were purchased from Becton Dickinson (San Jose, CA) and 10% fetal bovine serum from PAA Laboratories (Linz, Austria). Stavudine, redoxal, and uridine were purchased from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany).
Cell Culture
HepG2 cells were propagated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in Dulbeccos modified Eagle medium, containing 4.5 g/L glucose and 110 mg/L pyruvate, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 U/ml streptomycin, 50 U/L penicillin, and 250 µg/L amphotericin B. HepG2 cells (2.7 x 106) were seeded during logarithmic growth at day 1 and harvested at days 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25. Cells were counted in a CASY cell counter (Schärfe System, Reutlingen, Germany) and 2.7 x 106 cells were replated in new flasks. Medium was renewed at the time of harvest and on every third day after plating.2
Stavudine was added in concentrations corresponding to the stavudine steady state peak plasma concentration of 3.6 µmol/L (Cmax) in humans during HIV therapy.2
Stavudine-exposed cells were also incubated with or without uridine (200 µmol/L) and redoxal, an inhibitor of DHODH.20
The concentration of redoxal (20 µmol/L) was chosen to slow down growth of HepG2 cells by
50%. Control HepG2 cells were cultured in medium without stavudine, uridine, or redoxal. A second set of HepG2 control cells was incubated with uridine alone.
MtDNA Copy Numbers
Total DNA was extracted with the QIAamp DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). MtDNA and nDNA copy numbers were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the ABI 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). We amplified the mtDNA ATP-6 gene between nucleotide positions 8981 and 9061 with the forward primer, 5'-ACCAATAGCCCTGGCCGTAC-3' and the backward primer 5'-GGTGGCGCTTCCAATTAGGT-3'. MtDNA was quantified with a FAM-fluorophore labeled probe (5'-6FAM-CCTAACCGCTAACATTACTGCAGGCCACC-TAMRA-3'). For the detection of nDNA we selected exon number 8 of the GAPDH gene between nucleotide positions 4280 and 4342, using the forward primer 5'-CGGGGCTCTCCAGAACATC-3' and the backward primer 5'-ATGACCTTGCCCACAGCCT-3'. In this case we used a VIC-fluorophore-labeled probe (5'-VIC-CCCTGCCTCTACTGGCGCTGCC-TAMRA-3').
Each 25-µl reaction contained 25 ng of genomic DNA, 100 nmol/L probe, 200 nmol/L primers, and TaqMan universal master mix (Applied Biosystems). Amplifications of mitochondrial and nuclear products were separately performed in optical 96-well plates (Applied Biosystems). An initial incubation at 50°C for 2 minutes was followed by 10 minutes at 95°C and 40 denaturing steps at 95°C (15 seconds), alternating with combined annealing/extension at 60°C (1 minute). All samples were run in triplicate. Absolute mtDNA and nDNA copy numbers were calculated using serial dilutions of plasmids with known copy numbers.22
Respiratory Chain Subunits
The subunit II of cytochrome c-oxidase (COXII) is encoded by mtDNA, whereas the subunit IV of cytochrome c-oxidase (COXIV) is encoded by nDNA. COXII was quantified by immunoblot from 106 HepG2 cells and normalized to the signal of a simultaneously used antibody against COXIV as described.22 Signal intensities were densitometrically quantified using Scion Image (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD).
Determination of Intracellular ATP
ATP was extracted from 106 cells and measured in a microplate luminometer (LB96V; Berthold-Technologies, Wildbad, Germany) against an ATP standard (10–4 mol/L to 10–12 mol/L) using an ATP bioluminescence assay kit (HSII; Roche, Penzberg, Germany).
Lipid Content and Lipid Peroxidation
Lipids were freshly extracted from 1 x 106 HepG2 cells using methanol/chloroform/water according to the Bligh-Dyer method and quantified spectrophotometrically by means of a sulfo-phospho-vanillin reaction on lipid standards (Sigma) as described.23 Malondialdehyde is one of the end products of lipid peroxidation and an indicator of free radical production and oxidative stress. Malondialdehyde was spectrophotometrically quantified in 1 x 106 HepG2 cells with an assay for thiobarbituric acid reactive material.24
Caspase 3 Activation
Activation of caspase 3 plays a central role in the execution of apoptotic cell death.25 Activated caspase 3 can be sensitively detected in living cells by staining with by Red-DEVD-FMK, a cell permeable, nontoxic dye (CaspGlow Red; MBL Laboratories Woburn, MA). Cells were stained with 1 µl of Red-DEVD-FMK per 300 µl of medium for 30 minutes at 37°C according to the manufacturers instruction. Red fluorescence was visualized using a spectral confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP2 AOBS; Leica Microsystems, Bensheim, Germany).
Real-Time Quantification of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Gene Transcripts
After 10 days of incubation, RNA was extracted from 1 x 106 cells (RNeasy kit, Qiagen). Quantity and integrity of the RNA were verified using RNA 6000 nano chips (2100 Bioanalyzer; Agilent, Palo Alto, CA). Five µg of RNA from each sample was reverse-transcribed using 200 U Superscript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 100 µmol/L oligo(dT)12-18 (Invitrogen) as primer.
Primer pairs were designed with the aid of the universal probe library from Roche Diagnostics Corp. (Indianapolis, IN) in an intron-spanning manner to avoid unspecific amplification of contaminating genomic DNA. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1
. Gene expression was quantified using the Light Cycler 489 (Roche) on a 384-well plate. Ten-µl reactions contained 5 µl of SYBR Green I master mix (Roche), 50 ng cDNA template, and 0.5 µmol/L of each primer. Target genes were run in duplicate on a single plate, which included the samples from all treatments, plus a no template control. Light cycling conditions were as follows: activation (95°C for 10 seconds), 40 amplification cycles (95°C for 10 seconds, 52°C for 5 seconds, and 72°C for 12 seconds). PCR conditions were optimized for all genes to ensure a PCR efficiency of 2. Melting curve analysis was done to ensure that all transcripts under investigation were represented by a single peak, indicating specificity. Gene expression was calculated from the real-time PCR efficiency26
in relation to the mean of four housekeeping genes (LMNB1, GAPDH, ACTB, and 36B4) commonly used.27,28
To estimate the reliability of our assays, proliferating cell nuclear antigen mRNA was measured in duplicate using two different primer sets. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen mRNA copies varied by a mean factor of 1.3 (SD, 0.34) between the two primer sets. For gene abbreviations, please refer to Table 2
.
|
|
All cell cultures were performed in triplicates. Each of these three completely independent cultures was used for each biomarker measurement at each time point. Group means were compared by analysis of variance, followed by unpaired t-tests. Graphics and statistical calculations were performed using the Sigma Plot 2000, version 8.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and the Sigma Stat, version 3.1 (Jandel Inc., San Rafael, CA) software packages.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The HepG2 cells proliferated rapidly in medium without any additional agent. At the time of each harvest, the 2.7 x 106 cells seeded had doubled approximately every 2 days, resulting in 1.5 x 107 cells (SD, 3.0 x 106). Redoxal (20 µmol/L) approximately halved the rate of cell proliferation at each harvest (Figure 2)
. Stavudine (3.6 µmol/L) in contrast led to a time-dependent decrease of cell proliferation. The addition of redoxal to stavudine significantly enhanced the time-dependent inhibition of cell division by stavudine, whereas uridine (200 µmol/L) restored cell proliferation under co-treatment with redoxal alone, stavudine alone, and the combination of the two agents. Phase contrast microscopy performed after 25 days of exposure demonstrated abundant viable cells with all exposures. Cells treated with stavudine and/or redoxal without uridine appeared to be less abundant and slightly larger compared to their uridine-co-treated counterparts. Cell size however was not formally quantified.
|
HepG2 cells exposed to stavudine developed a time-dependent mtDNA depletion, temporally preceding the decrease of cell proliferation (Figure 3)
. Whereas redoxal alone did not alter mtDNA levels, it accelerated the decline of mtDNA copy numbers in cells co-treated with stavudine. Uridine fully abrogated the onset of mtDNA depletion induced by stavudine, and by the combination of redoxal plus stavudine.
|
|
The low concentration of stavudine that we used in the experiments described above did in not alter intracellular lipid content. The use of higher concentrations of stavudine (36 µmol/L) however, or 25-day exposure, strongly induced intracellular steatosis (not shown), as previously published.12 Redoxal also led to a time-dependent enhancement of intracellular lipids that was further enhanced in the combination of redoxal with stavudine (not shown). In all settings, lipid accumulation was fully prevented by the addition of uridine.12
Lipid Peroxidation
The generation of reactive oxygen species is an unavoidable byproduct of mitochondrial electron transport.29
Malondialdehyde production, an indicator of oxidative stress and production of free radicals was enhanced by stavudine and to a greater extent by redoxal. Uridine fully abrogated the effects of both agents on lipid peroxidation (Figure 5)
.
|
Animal models indicate enhanced hepatic apoptosis when liver mtDNA is depleted.6,30
We tested if putative indirect DHODH inhibition by stavudine may have effects on apoptosis similar to direct DHODH inhibition by redoxal. By analyzing the activation of the effector caspase 3, we found redoxal not to activate this protease (Figure 6)
. Stavudine also activated caspase 3 only minimally. Combining redoxal with stavudine however clearly increased the activation of caspase 3. Uridine fully prevented caspase 3 activation by stavudine and redoxal, alone and in combination.
|
To characterize the impact of redoxal and stavudine on cell cycle, we analyzed several transcripts involved in cell cycle checkpoint regulation (Table 2)
. p21 is a protein that promotes cell cycle arrest by binding to and inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk), which normally, when coupled with specific cyclins, facilitate the orderly procession of the cell cycle. p21 accumulation thus impairs the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases, and promotes cell cycle arrest in G1.31
CDKN2A induces cell cycle arrest at G1 by preventing exit from G1 phase.32
We found that redoxal and stavudine induced an up-regulation of p21 and CDKN2A transcription. Other genes involved in cell cycling (proliferating cell nuclear antigen, UbcH10) were not changed by both substances. The combination of stavudine with redoxal led to a synergistic up-regulation of p21 and CDKN2A, two genes implicated in an arrest at the G1 phase of the cell cycle.32,33
This effect was attenuated by uridine.
The induction of apoptosis is governed by an elaborate array of checks and balances in which mitochondria participate.25,34 Intrinsic and extrinsic pathways to caspase-dependent cell death have been identified. Extrinsic apoptosis typically involves extracellular death receptors such as FAS, and recruitment of caspase 8. In intrinsic apoptosis, cellular stress is sensed by Bad and other proteins that then initiate Bax-dependent mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, resulting in caspase 9 and caspase 3 activation. Opening of the mitochondrial channel is antagonized by members of the Bcl-2 family. Redoxal and stavudine affected the transcription of many key players of apoptosis. Both agents participated synergistically in inducing caspase 3 transcription. Redoxal increased transcripts involved in the extrinsic (FAS, FASLG, and caspase 8) and intrinsic (Bad, caspase 3) pathway of apoptosis. The combination of redoxal with stavudine led to a further, mostly additive increase of gene transcripts compared to each treatment alone. Uridine normalized or attenuated these effects, but when given alone, had no action on gene transcripts involved in apoptosis.
Among the genes involved in mitochondrial energy metabolism, we observed a 4.1-fold increase in 16S rRNA transcripts with stavudine at day 10. Despite mtDNA depletion, the combination of redoxal with stavudine was found to synergistically up-regulate mtDNA encoded respiratory chain transcripts (ND1, COXI, ATP6, and ND6). nDNA encoded mtDNA transcripts (COXIV, ATP9) were also up-regulated. Similarly, polymerase-
transcripts and the peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor-
co-activator (PGC1), a molecule involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and gluconeogenesis were found to be induced. Notably, the mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) that binds to mtDNA as a chaperone35
was not up-regulated. Uridine fully normalized the transcript profile of all genes involved in energy metabolism.
Many enzymes participate in the pyrimidine and purine de novo synthesis, interconversion and salvage (Figure 1)
. The application of stavudine or redoxal most notably increased the steady state levels of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) transcripts. TP participates in the salvage of thymine, but is also responsible for the catabolism of thymidine analogues. The other gene transcripts tested were not affected. When we combined redoxal with stavudine, most genes related to nucleotide metabolism were up-regulated in a more than additive manner, indicating synergistic toxicity. Among the enzymes participating in the de novo synthesis of pyrimidines, UMPS and DHFR, but not DHODH were up-regulated. Genes responsible for pyrimidine salvage (UPP1, UCK2, TP, TK1, DCK) were also induced, as was DGUOK, an enzyme that regulates the intramitochondrial supply of purines and which is implicated in a hepatocerebral mtDNA depletion syndrome.36
The addition of uridine to the combination of stavudine plus redoxal reverted transcript levels.
We also analyzed the transcription of three genes participating in the scavenging of reactive oxygen species (GPX1, SOD1, SOD2). At the transcriptional level, stavudine had no significant effects at day 10, whereas redoxal up-regulated cytosolic and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (SOD1, SOD2). The combination of redoxal with stavudine, slightly enhanced SOD2 expression. Uridine normalized transcripts associated with radical scavenging.
We finally studied the synergistic action of redoxal and stavudine with respect to transcripts involved in DNA repair. Oxidative base lesions of purines and pyrimidines in nuclear DNA and mtDNA are mainly repaired by base excision.37 The major enzyme removing oxidized pyrimidine in mitochondria DNA is UNG1.38,39 Oxidized purines are removed by OGG1.37 After the release of damaged bases, the resulting apurinic/apyrimidinic sites are cleaved by APE1 in the nucleus as well as in mitochondria.38 Redoxal induced a slight up-regulation of genes related to base excision repair, whereas stavudine had no impact. Combining redoxal with stavudine specifically increased mitochondrial pyrimidine (UNG1) and purine (OGG1) repair, as well as APE1. Although uridine alone had no effects, it virtually normalized the expression of repair transcripts when given with both other agents.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
inhibitor and focused on the role of diminished intracellular pyrimidine pools as a possible consequence of, and sensitizer for, mtDNA depletion. At the same time, we also investigated the effects of uridine in abrogating this mitochondrial cytotoxicity. With the use of redoxal, an inhibitor of de novo pyrimidine synthesis, we demonstrated that pyrimidine removal sensitizes HepG2 cells toward stavudine-induced mtDNA depletion, an effect that preceded, or was paralleled by multiple other cellular events. The fact that the toxicological profile of stavudine and redoxal was similar and was either attenuated or almost completely antagonized by uridine as one single agent strongly suggests that pyrimidine depletion plays an important intermediary role and possibly represents even a common denominator in this form of toxicity. Our findings thus support a vicious circle according to which stavudine-mediated mtDNA and pyrimidine depletion allows for an accelerated mtDNA depletion by the same agent. The importance of pyrimidine depletion for the adverse cellular effects of stavudine is also underlined by the fact that the gene expression was multiplicative for the genes involved in nucleotide metabolism, whereas it was mostly additive for other pathways. Interestingly, some genes involved in purine nucleotide metabolism (DGUOK) were also up-regulated, possibly reflecting the fact that inhibition of the respiratory chain also causes a breakdown in purine triphosphates.18
We also investigated the effects of pyrimidine replenishment by uridine on other cellular pathways. From studies with leflunomide, another direct DHODH inhibitor, there is evidence that low intracellular pyrimidine pools trigger and mediate apoptosis.33,40 In our experiments we were not able to detect apoptosis in terms of caspase 3 activation with either stavudine or redoxal alone because we specifically selected the concentration of each agent to only diminish cell proliferation by 50%. In the combination of redoxal and stavudine however, we detected a clear activation of the effector caspase 3 and an up-regulation of multiple gene transcripts involved in apoptosis. Similar proapoptotic effects including caspase 3 activation by hepatic mtDNA depletion have also been observed in vivo.6,30 In light of the preserved ATP levels and the antagonism by uridine, our results suggest that pyrimidine depletion and not the lack of chemical energy is the intracellular harbinger of apoptosis. In addition our results suggest that the pyrimidine depletion by stavudine results in a cell cycle arrest at G1, as indicated by the up-regulation of p21 and CDKN2A. Such G1 arrest was previously suggested to also result from direct DHODH inhibition.33,41
With stavudine exposure, the mtDNA-encoded respiratory chain transcripts did not change despite a 50% reduction in mtDNA copy numbers at the same time point. Thus, the preservation of respiratory chain protein (COXII) results at least in part from compensation at the transcriptional level. The simultaneous up-regulation of 16S rRNA may be interpreted as an additional translational effort for compensation. Both mechanisms may act in concert and explain in part the sigmoidal genotype phenotype correlation, commonly referred to as threshold effect.42
Redoxal alone also enhanced some nuclear transcripts involved in energy metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis. To the same end, leflunomide was previously found to induce the proliferation of mitochondria.43 This is best explained by the cross talk between mitochondria and nucleus. For example, mice deficient in ANT1 (a mitochondrial nucleoside transporter) compensate for the lack of cytosolic ATP by increasing mitochondrial transcripts related to oxidative phosphorylation.44 How redoxal enhances oxidative stress is unknown. The fact that malondialdehyde levels of cells treated with redoxal alone were similar to those treated with redoxal plus stavudine may indicate that oxidative stress does not account for the observed induction of apoptosis under the combination of redoxal with stavudine.
Our results have several clinically important implications. In HIV patients treated with stavudine, therapeutic agents that have an impact on pyrimidine pools should be avoided. Such substances are leflunomide, but may also be inhibitors of tetrahydrofolate reductase such as methotrexate, aminopterin, pyrimethamine, and trimethoprim. A metabolite of the anti-herpes drug brivudin inhibits dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thus may adversely affect the intracellular balance of natural pyrimidines and stavudine.45
Gender-specific differences in pyrimidine pools may contribute to the higher incidence of lactic acidosis in females.11
An interaction with the intramitochondrial availability of pyrimidines may also explain the observation that some NRTIs increase the mitochondrial toxicity of other NRTIs, although they by themselves have no impact on polymerase-
.2,46
Zidovudine for example does not induce hepatic mtDNA depletion in vitro and in vivo5,47
but instead may limit pyrimidine supply by being an inhibitor of thymidine kinases.48
In accord with the importance of the availability of intracellular pyrimidines, the toxicity of zidovudine can be antagonized by uridine.12,13,17,49
In summary, our findings suggest that the intracellular depletion of pyrimidine metabolites sensitizes for mtDNA depletion and is also an important intermediary between mtDNA depletion and multiple secondary adverse effects. Pyrimidine depletion also provides an explanation of the mitochondrial toxicity of some agents, which do not inhibit mtDNA replication. Uridine supplementation has no intrinsic effects on cell metabolism, but is a promising strategy in the treatment of side effects related to pyrimidine depletion. Drugs, which have an impact on pyrimidine pools, should be avoided in HIV patients treated with stavudine.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. Wa1387/1-5).
Accepted for publication November 28, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |