| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Published online before print October 2, 2008
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


From the Research Center for Genetic Medicine,* Childrens National Medical Center, Washington DC; Department of Developmental Biology and Neurosciences,
Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan; and School of Biological and Biochemical Sciences,
University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dysferlin protein was originally named based on its similarity to the Caenorhabditis elegans protein FER-1. FER-1 is responsible for mediating fusion of intracellular vesicles with the spermatid plasma membrane.8 Sequence homology between FER-1 and dysferlin includes tandem C2 domains and a C terminal transmembrane domain. The similarity in primary structure of the two proteins led to the suggestion that dysferlin may also play a role in membrane fusion events in skeletal muscle cells.9 C2 domains are known to bind calcium, phospholipids or proteins to trigger signaling events and membrane trafficking, and this has led to speculation that dysferlin is important for membrane repair in skeletal muscle.2,10 This hypothesis is supported by the finding that dysferlin deficient patient muscle shows numerous structural membrane defects when analyzed by electron microscopy, including tears in the plasma membrane and an accumulation of subsarcolemmal vesicles and vacuoles.11 Also, laser-induced membrane damage in dysferlin-deficient myofibers has highlighted reduced membrane resealing capability compared to normal muscle myofibers.12 These findings are consistent with a plasma membrane repair defect in dysferlin-deficient myofibers.
The current understanding of molecular and cellular defects in LGMD2B/MM does not explain a number of the enigmatic features of the presentation and progression of patients with dysferlin deficiency in muscle. First, dysferlin-deficient patients are typically quite healthy until their late teens, and in our patient cohort some patients showed impressive athletic skill at young age, before disease onset. Second, disease onset is typically in late teens or early twenties, and is often associated with a subacute onset of weakness, with marked muscle inflammation on muscle biopsy.13,14 The onset and inflammation often leads to the misdiagnosis of polymyositis.14,15 Finally, the relatively wide inter- and intrafamilial variation in clinical phenotype, subacute onset, and marked inflammation suggest that environmental factors, other genetic modifiers, or both may play a stronger role in LGMD2B than in the other dystrophies.
The aggressive inflammation often observed in dysferlin-deficient muscle distinguishes it from other Limb-girdle dystrophies. Systematic studies of the inflammatory cell content showed a predominance of macrophages, and CD4+ cells, however CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are also abundant.11,13,14 Normal monocytes contain dysferlin, and LGMD2B/MM patients lack dysferlin in their monocytes.16,17 We have recently shown that dysferlin-deficient monocytes display abnormal signaling and phagocytotic activity that could contribute to excessive inflammation in patient muscle.18 Further, human LGMD2B and mouse (SJL) dysferlin-deficient muscle showed macrophage and dendritic cell activation markers, including HLA-DR, HLA-ABC, and CD86 (human), and MOMA-2, CD11c, and ICAM-1 (mice) suggesting that mild myofiber damage in dysferlin-deficient muscle may result in an exaggerated monocyte/dendritic cell response secondary to dysferlin protein loss.
In the present study, we sought to identify the novel networks induced as a direct consequence of dysferlin deficiency. Key to our approach is the filtering out of molecular changes resulting from non-specific muscle pathology (degeneration, regeneration, fibrosis, and inflammation). To accomplish this, we compared a series of dysferlin-deficient, mutation-positive LGMD2B/Miyoshi patient muscle biopsy profiles to a muscular dystrophy of similar age of onset and clinical severity, LGMD2I, involving partial loss-of-function of FKRP (fukutin-related protein). We also included muscle biopsies from normal volunteers, Becker muscular dystrophy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as additional controls. This approach led to the identification of both vesicle trafficking and inflammatory changes that were specific to or strongly exaggerated in dysferlin-deficient muscle.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patient population in the study was taken from a molecular diagnostic referral population. Frozen muscle biopsies from patients with a tentative diagnosis of muscular dystrophy were sent to the Hoffman laboratory at Childrens National Medical Center, Washington DC. All samples were subjected to a standardized set of biochemical and histological assays. Tests included hematoxylin and eosin histological stains, dystrophin immunostaining,
-sarcoglycan immunostaining, merosin (laminin alpha2) immunostaining, dystrophin immunoblotting and dysferlin immunoblotting, as previously described.19
Patients were recruited and samples were analyzed under protocol 2405, which has been reviewed and approved by the Office for the Protection of Human Subjects at Childrens National Medical Center.
Muscle biopsies from four groups of subjects were studied for mutation and expression profiling studies: dysferlin deficient, FKRP (LGMD2I), Becker muscular dystrophy, normal volunteers (exercise studies), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). For dysferlin-deficient biopsies used in this study, twenty five patient biopsies showed complete or greatly reduced dysferlin signal by duplicate immunoblots (Table 1)
, and these patients were then used for subsequent dysferlin DNA mutation studies, mRNA profiling, and protein characterizations. For LGMD2I subjects, approximately 1000 frozen muscle biopsies from the diagnostic muscle tissue bank were selected, genomic DNA prepared from muscle cryosections, and mutation screening for the FKRP gene was done (see Materials and Methods). For Becker muscular dystrophy, patient biopsies showed dystrophin of abnormal size and quantity by duplicate immunoblots, and showed dystrophin gene deletion mutations. For ALS, patients were diagnosed by El Escorial criteria. Normal controls were from normal volunteers enrolled in exercise studies, and different biopsies used for mRNA profiling and protein validation studies.
|
For dysferlin-deficient patients, twenty five patients showing complete or greatly reduced dysferlin by duplicate immunoblots were selected, and genomic DNA was isolated from 10 mg of flash-frozen muscle biopsy using Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Gentra Systems Minneapolis, MA). 10 ng of the genomic DNA was used as a template for amplification of each of the 55 exons of the dysferlin gene using dysferlin specific intronic primers. Primers were designed using the PRIMER 3 software and amplification was performed using ABI Ampli Taq Gold reagents (Foster City, CA). PCR products were screened for base changes by using denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography on a Transgenomic Wave DNA Fragment Analysis System (San Jose, CA).20 Melting temperature profiles were determined by sequence analysis of PCR products by using WaveMaker 4.0 software (Transgenomics, Inc., San Jose, CA). For regions containing potential heteroduplexes by denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography, direct, automated sequencing was performed by using cycle sequencing reactions (Big Dye TM Terminator v3.1; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). An ABI 3130-Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) was used for sequencing. Data were analyzed with Sequencher TM 4.1.4 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI).
For LGMD2I patients, genomic DNA was extracted as described above from approximately 1000 muscle biopsies. Each DNA sample were first screened for the common mutation [c.826C>A (p.Leu276Ile)]21 using a TaqMan allele discrimination assay. Those showing heterozygosity for p.Leu276Ile were then subjected to DNA sequencing.
Mutation numbering is based on DYSF or FKRP cDNA (with sequence position 1 being the A in the first ATG codon). A "c." and "p." prefix, respectively, denotes to cDNA and protein sequences. The reference sequences used were derived from GenBank ID NM_003494.2 (Dysferlin), or GenBank ID NM_024301.2 (FKRP). Mutations were detected by sequencing both strands and were confirmed by resequencing of newly amplified PCR products. All mutations have been deposited in the Leiden Muscular Dystrophy database (Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center; http://www.dmd.nl/).
mRNA Expression Profiling
RNA was extracted from ten dysferlin deficient, nine fukutin-related protein (FKRP) mutation positive samples, eleven normal volunteers, and seven ALS muscle biopsy samples using the Trizol (Invitrogen Carsland, CA) method followed by further purification on RNeasy columns. Isolated RNA from each individual sample was used to prepare biotinylated cRNA target according to manufacture protocols (Affymetrix, CA). Twenty micrograms of biotinylated cRNAs from samples were fragmented and hybridized to 37 individual Affymetrix GeneChip HG U133 Plus2 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) for 16 hours. The arrays were washed and stained on the Affymetrix Fluidics station 400, using instructions and reagents provided by Affymetrix. This involves removal of non-hybridized material, and then incubation with phycoerythrin-streptavidin to detect bound cRNA. The signal intensity was amplified by second staining with biotin labeled anti-streptavidin antibody followed by phycoerythrin- streptavidin staining. Fluorescent images were captured using Hewlett-Packard G2500A gene Array Scanner. All of the arrays used in the study passed the quality control set by Tumor analysis group 2004.22
Data Analysis
Initial data analysis of Affymetrix microarrays was done using Genechip GX software (version 7.3.1), with standard operating procedures and quality controls as described previously (Tumor analysis group 2004).22 Normalized signals (expression values) were calculated using three probe set algorithms, DNA-Chip Analyzer 1.7 model based expression (dChip/mismatch model),23 Microarray Suite 5 (MAS5) (Affymetrix) probe set algorithms, and Probe Logarithmic Intensity Error, SDK Version 2 (PLIER) (Affymetrix). We have previously reported that PLIER and dCHIP difference model probe set algorithms provide a good signal/noise ratio in human muscle expression profiling projects,24,25 and we also added MAS5 probe set algorithm as this remains the most commonly used. CEL processed image files were analyzed separately for MAS5, dCHIP, and PLIER probe set algorithms. For the study of molecular markers of inflammatory cell subsets and activation states, and for analysis of transcripts previously reported as differentially regulated, a candidate gene approach was used (See Supplemental Table S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). For non-candidate (global) analysis approaches, we used concordance for three probe set algorithms and a relatively stringent P value threshold (P < 0.005) for each of the three probe set algorithms.
Immunohistochemistry Analysis
Muscle biopsies selected for protein validation studies included a subset of those used for microarray studies (dysferlin-deficient, FKRP [LGMD2I]), as well as additional biopsies from Becker muscular dystrophy, Juvenile Dermatomyositis patients and for normal controls that showed no histological or biochemical abnormality. Serial 6 µm-thick frozen muscle sections were cut with an IEC Minotome cryostat, mounted to Superfrost Plus Slides (Fisher Scientific Pittsburgh, PA). Sections were then blocked for 30 minutes in 10% horse serum and 1x PBS and incubated with respective antibodies for 2 hours at room temperature. Mouse monoclonal antibody against versican (US Biological Swampscott, MA) and tenascin-C (Sigma St. Louis, MO) at the 1:1500 dilutions and myoferlin at 1:20 dilutions were used.26
Antibodies used included a rabbit polyclonal antibody against Rab27A (IBL, Japan) at the concentration of 2 µg/ml along, a mouse monoclonal antibody against laminin
2 (Chemicon, CA) at 1:500, and a mouse monoclonal antibody against HLA-DR (DakoCytomation, CA) at 1:50. Washes were done with 10% horse serum and 1x PBS and sections were then incubated with respective secondary antibody, Cy3 and Cy2 conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody and Cy3 conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch Inc. Westgrove, PA) at a 1:500 dilution. Isotype-matched mouse and rabbit Igs were used instead of primary antibodies as negative controls.
Confocal images were captured on the inverted Olympus microscope equipped with a x40 (DApo 40UV/340: NA 1.30) or x60 (Splan Apo; NA 1.4) objective lens, Bio-rad confocal hardware (Bio-rad MRC 1024 ES, Bio-rad Hercules, CA), and a 15mW air-cooled Cr/Ar laser for excitation. Cy3 and Cy2 were detected using standard protocols for Cy3 and Cy2 antibody respectively.
Immunoblot Analysis
Biopsy cryosections were solubilized with 100 µl JSB buffer (0.1 M Tris pH 8.0, 10% SDS, 50 mmol/L DTT, 10 mmol/L EDTA, pH 8.0, and 0.02% bromophenol blue). The lysate was boiled for 5 minutes and then centrifuged at 13,000 x g at 4°C for 5 minutes. Ten microliters of each supernatant was run on a ready-cast 4% to 15% Tris-HCl polyacrylamide gel (Biorad) with protein markers (Kaleidoscope Precision Plus protein standard, Biorad, CA). Samples were then transferred onto Hybond C Extra membrane (Amersham, Little Chalfont, UK), blots blocked in 5% milk in Tris- buffered saline with 0.5% Tween 20, and then incubated with primary antibodies (below), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Slp2a-SHD antibody was affinity-purified rabbit IgG, used at 2 µg/ml concentration for immunoblot.27 Rab27A antibody was also affinity purified rabbit IgG and used at 5 µg/ml concentration for immunoblot. Myoferlin immunoblotting was done using a mouse monoclonal supernatant26 at dilution of 1:50. Dysferlin immunoblotting was done with a mouse monoclonal at a dilution of 1:200 (NCL-Hamlet-2, Novocastra). After incubation three washes with TBST followed by incubation in respective horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Biorad). Detection of protein bands was performed using ECL detection kit (Amersham) and Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham) X-ray film.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We characterized a series of LGMD patient muscle biopsies at both the biochemical and genetic level, with the goal of defining molecular networks specific to dysferlin-deficient muscle (LGMD2B or MM). Twenty-five subjects showing complete or partial dysferlin deficiency by immunoblot analyses of muscle biopsies were studied for dysferlin gene mutations (Table 1)
. Genomic DNA was isolated from each biopsy and tested for mutations of all 55 exons of the dysferlin gene using denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography and sequencing. Nineteen of the 25 subjects studied tested positive for gene mutations (Table 1)
. Out of these 19 mutation-positive patients, two patients were homozygous, nine (47%) were compound heterozygotes, and in eight patients we were able to detect only one mutation. In all, 26 distinct sequence variants were identified and 13 (50%) were novel to this report.
For LGMD2I patients, approximately 1000 muscle biopsies were first tested for the common mutation in FKRP gene [c.826C>A (p.Leu276Ile)] using a Taqman allele discrimination assay (Table 1)
. Sixteen patients showed heterozygosity for common mutation and ten were homozygous. Heterozygotes were then subjected to coding region DNA sequencing, and five compound heterozygotes identified. Of these, nine mutation-positive patient muscle biopsies were used for mRNA profiling and protein studies (Table 1)
.
mRNA Profiling Shows Most Transcriptional Changes to be Shared between LGMD2B and LGMD2I
We used mRNA profiling of 54,000 probe sets in patient muscle biopsies from LGMD2B/MM (dysferlin deficiency; n = 10), LGMD2I (FKRP deficiency; n = 9), ALS (n = 7), and normal volunteers (n = 11) using the HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarrays (Affymetrix). To interpret the microarray data, we used multiple probe set algorithms (MAS5.0, dCHIP difference model, PLIER).
Initial data analysis was done focusing on candidate genes or proteins, previously reported as aberrantly expressed in dysferlin-deficient muscle from either human patients, or mouse models (Figure 1A)
.28-32
Fourteen probe sets corresponding to full length transcripts from 10 genes were queried in dysferlin-deficient, FKRP-deficient and normal control muscle biopsies. Seven of the 10 previously reported transcripts genes showed similar expression in dysferlin- and FKRP-deficient muscle (Figure 1A)
. These data suggest that many of the previously reported differentially expressed genes in dysferlin-deficient muscle are shared with other dystrophies, and likely reflective of general muscle pathology rather than biochemical pathways directly related to dysferlin-deficiency.
|
Fer1L3 (myoferlin) has been proposed to show compensatory up-regulation in dysferlin-deficient muscle. In our series here, myoferlin was highly up-regulated in both LGMD2I and dysferlin-deficient muscle, although it was significantly higher in dysferlin-deficient patient muscle (Figure 1A)
. We validated this finding using immunostaining and immunoblotting of myoferlin (See Supplement Figure S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Myoferlin expression was quite variable from biopsy to biopsy, and was most increased in a dysferlin-deficient muscle showing considerable fibrofatty replacement (patient D5, See Supplement Figure S1A at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). By immunostaining, myoferlin protein expression was strongly expressed on all myofibers and blood vessels (veins, arteries, and capillaries), as well as increased staining in perimysial connective tissue (See Supplement Figure S1B http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Myoferlin is considered a developmental isoform in muscle (myoblast/myotube fusion), but we found myoferlin to be expressed in all myofibers in both dysferlin deficiency and FKRP [LGMD2I] patients, and not limited to regenerating fibers.
mRNA Profiling, Identifies Disease-Specific Abnormalities in Dysferlin-Deficiency
To identify differentially expressed genes specific for dysferlin deficient patients (LGMD2B and MM), we used a two tiered approach for the analysis of the expression profiles. First, we compared a combined normal and disease control group of profiles (normal volunteers, ALS, and FKRP [LGMD2I]; n = 27) with dysferlin deficient profiles (n = 10). Probe sets with analysis of variance P < 0.01 for each of three distinct probe set algorithms (dCHIP difference model, PLIER, MAS5.0) were retained. Nine hundred and twenty two (922) genes were differentially expressed in the dysferlin-deficient group by this analysis. This initial tier of analysis was done to filter out probe sets that showed high variation between human muscle biopsies. As a second tier, we then created a two group dataset (LGMD2B n = 10; LGMD2I n = 9), and retained those transcripts from the 922 that showed analysis of variance P < 0.005 for one or more probe set algorithms, and 271 of the 922 survived this stringent statistical filter for disease-specificity for one probe set algorithm, and 58 of the 271 (21%) were concordant for all three algorithms. A description of each of the 58 probe sets is provided (Table 2)
. Graphical representation of these 58 probe sets is shown in the heat map in Figure 1B
. Of these, 21% showed lower mRNA levels in LGMD2B, and 79% showed increased levels.
|
The 58 dysferlin-deficient-specific transcripts were queried to affirm that they detected the canonical full-length transcripts (non-intronic), and for potential functional significance in muscle vesicle trafficking or inflammation. With regards to membrane and vesicle trafficking, two proteins were particularly interesting; Rab27A and Slp2a. Both were increased in all dysferlin-deficient patients, yet were not increased in any control or FKRP [LGMD2I] patient biopsy (Figure 1C)
.
The Rab proteins are a family of over 60 genes that encode small GTP-binding proteins involved in intracellular membrane traffic, and each works in concert with a protein binding partner (effector) that bind to activated (GTP-bound) Rab forms. Rab27A has been well-studied as mutations result in an immune deficiency genetic disorder (Griselli Syndrome type II), and Rab27-binding effectors are members of the synaptotagmin-like family (Slp).34 The two genes identified in our dysferlin-specific profiles, Rab27A and Slp2a, have been shown to directly interact in melanosome traffic in melanocytes.27,35
We hypothesized that the increased levels of Rab27A and Slp2 seen in dysferlin-deficient muscle could represent compensatory up-regulation of an alternative vesicle trafficking pathway. To test this, we examined the protein expression of Rab27A in normal controls, dysferlin-deficient, LGMD2I and Becker dystrophy patient muscle biopsies by immunostaining (Figure 2)
. Co-staining with laminin
2 (merosin) was performed (Figure 2)
. No detectable protein expression of Rab27A was observed in normal biopsies (n = 3), LGMD2I (n = 3) and Becker dystrophy (n = 3) patients. Dysferlin-deficient biopsies (n = 6) all showed detectable Rab27A immunostaining. Rab27A staining was evident within myofibers, typically as a punctate staining pattern distributed throughout the cytoplasm. The staining intensity was variable, with a mosaic pattern of some myofibers showing very high levels and others low levels (see patient D10; Figure 2
), while in other biopsies the majority of myofibers showed increased staining signal (see patient D1, D3 Figure 2
).
|
|
We then tested for levels of Slp2a protein. Antibody for Slp2a detected the expected 110kDa protein by immunoblotting in all six dysferlin-deficient patients tested but no expression was detected in each of the normal controls (n = 4) or FKRP (LGMD2I; n = 4) patient muscles (Figure 4)
.
|
Inflammatory Changes in LGMD2B
LGMD2B patients can show an inflammatory onset, and can be misdiagnosed as polymyositis. We queried the profiles for proteins well characterized and specific for T cells (CD2, CD4, CD3E, CD28, CD45, CD152), tissue dendritic cells (CD8a, CD83, CD86), B cells (CD19, CD22), and macrophage activation markers (23 transcripts; see Supplemental Table S1, at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). This showed that the majority of marker transcripts were strongly elevated in the two dystrophies relative to normal control muscle, but similarly expressed between LGMD2I and LGMD2B (Figure 5
; See Supplemental Table S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). B cell and dendritic cell markers showed no significant differences.
|
We also found four activated macrophage markers significantly increased in dysferlin-deficient muscle (LCP2, RAD1, ANXA4, S100A13), and one marker decreased (RAC1) (Figure 5B)
. Most of these markers are involved in membrane remodeling, and may be reflective of altered vesicle traffic.
We also searched our stringent global data set concordant for all three probe set algorithms for inflammation-associated transcripts. Two extracellular matrix markers of inflammation, tenascin-C and versican, were up-regulated in both dystrophies, but significantly higher in dysferlin-deficient muscle (Figure 1C)
. To validate the microarray data and to examine the tissue localization of tenascin-C (A, B, C) and versican (D, E, F) we performed immunostaining on patient muscle biopsies (Figure 5C)
. Both proteins showed similar localization in endomysial connective tissue and blood vessels. Normal control muscles (n = 6) showed relatively rare punctate staining, often near capillaries. Both FKRP [LGMD2I] (n = 6) and dysferlin-deficient muscle [LGMD2B] (n = 6) showed a marked increase in immunostaining, with extensive labeling of the endomysial connective tissue, with increased intensity around all myofibers, likely at or near the basal lamina. Immunostaining was considerably more intense in dysferlin-deficient muscle compared to LGMD2I (Figure 5C)
, consistent with the microarray mRNA data.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rab27A is a member of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins, and many of the members have been shown to control intracellular membrane trafficking in eukaryotic cells.34 In melanocytes, Rab27A, together with Slp2a, has been shown to be involved in the control of melanosome transport, especially at the anchoring of melanosomes to the plasma membrane.35 In cytotoxic T lymphocytes, Rab27A participates in lytic granule exocytosis.40 Rab27A effector Slp2a also mediates tight docking of mucus granules onto apical plasma membrane of gastric surface mucous cells.41
Rab27A, like other Rab family members, directly interacts with membranes and vesicles via covalent attachment to lipid (prenylation), and then requires effector proteins bound to their N-terminal SHD-domains to dictate what downstream action is to be taken with the vesicle (transport, fusion, exocytosis, etc). Rab27A has multiple effector proteins in different cell types,34 however Slp2a, a member of the synaptotagmin like protein family, has been shown to be the Rab27A effector for melanosome transport in melanocytes.27,35
We found Slp2a to be induced in dysferlin deficient muscle, and like Rab27A, was a disease-specific finding. Synaptotagmins are structurally related to dysferlin, where both contain multiple C2 domains, and both function as Ca2+ sensors in the process of vesicular trafficking and exocytosis (Figure 6A)
. Thus, it is likely that Rab27A and Slp2a are binding partners in dysferlin-deficient muscle, and are functioning as a compensatory vesicle trafficking pathway. Myoferlin, a C2-containing protein very closely related to dysferlin, was also strongly induced in dysferlin-deficient muscles around all myofibers (See Supplement Figure S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). However, this was not disease-specific, as FKRP patient muscle also showed strong upregulation around all fibers. Nevertheless, myoferlin may participate with Rab27A/Slp2a in providing compensatory membrane repair in dysferlin-deficient muscle.
|
The data presented in this report, taken together with the recently reported functional studies of dysferlin-deficient monocytes/macrophages,18
lays the foundation for a model that may explain molecular mechanism of the subacute inflammatory onset of LGMD2B/MM. In normal muscle, dysferlin participates in calcium-sensitive vesicle traffic and membrane repair (Figure 6B)
. In dysferlin-deficient muscle, this vesicle pathway is lost, and this leads to compensatory up-regulation of an alternative vesicle traffic pathway involving a C2-domain containing protein related to dysferlin, Slp2a, and its binding partner Rab27A (Figure 6B)
. We hypothesize that the Slp2a/Rab27A pathway, possibly in concert with the up-regulated myoferlin pathways, is able to effectively perform calcium-mediated membrane repair in dysferlin-deficient muscle. These compensatory pathways rescue muscle function, and permit patients to remain asymptomatic until their late teens or early 20s.
Muscle pathology, presentation, and disease progression may be related to three interconnected microenvironmental changes in dysferlin-deficient muscle that occur later and may be associated with muscle damage. First, the Slp2a/Rab27A pathway is an endocytotic/exocytotic pathway, and it may repair membrane damage but then release vesicular contents to the extracellular space (Figure 6B)
. This may lead to perturbed growth factor and cytokine milieu. Second, LGMD2B patient muscle macrophages are themselves dysferlin-deficient, and these cells have been shown to overstimulate rho/rac signaling, and show abnormally high phagocytotic activity18
(Figure 6B)
. Third, infiltrating T cells are known to rely on the Rab27A/Slp2a/MYO5A vesicle pathway for lytic granule fusion and cell killing, and the aberrant release of Rab27A/Slp2a vesicles by myofibers may inappropriately signal CD8 T cell killing of MHC class I expressing myofibers. The combination of these three factors may lead to a pro-inflammatory milieu, culminating in immune cell mediated myofiber damage. This model may explain the strong focal increases of versican and tenascin-C seen in dysferlin-deficient muscle (Figure 6)
.
The inflammatory infiltrate in dysferlin deficient muscle consists of macrophages, dendritic cells, and CD4 and CD8 T cells.14,38
We found increase in costimulatory markers (increase in CD86 on dendritic cell, increase in CD28 and decrease in inhibitory CD152 [CTLA4] on T cells) suggesting a skewed T cell activation in dysferlin deficient muscle (Figure 5A
; Supplementary Table S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Tenascin and versican are known to bind and immobilize growth factors in the tissue micromilieu, thereby protecting them from proteolytic cleavage and facilitating presentation to appropriate cell surface receptors. Thus, both proteins facilitate the inflammatory process, while recruiting cell types involved in wound repair and fibrosis, such as myofibroblasts. We hypothesize that the increased rho signaling in macrophages, altered costimulatory pathways leading to activation of T cells within the muscle, and the disease-specific alteration of the tissue microenvironment combine to drive the inflammatory onset of LGMD2B.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (5R01NS029525; Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center 1P30HD40677-06; National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research 5R24HD050846-02) (to EPH) and [RO1-AR050478 and 5U54HD053177to KN, and the Jain Foundation].
Supplemental material for this article can be found on http://ajp.amjpathol.org.
Accepted for publication July 29, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |