| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Published online before print October 30, 2008
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








||
From the Laboratory of Retinal Cell Biology,* and Departments of Ophthalmology
and Internal Medicine,
Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo; Center for Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance,
University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba; Department of Molecular Genetics,¶ Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto; Inaida Endowed Department of Anti-Aging Ophthalmology,|| Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness in developed countries. AMD is complicated by choroidal neovascularization (CNV), leading to severe vision loss due to hemorrhage and exudation from the immature new vessels.8,9 Epidemiological risk factors for AMD were reported to include hypertension,10 dyslipidemia,10 and atherosclerosis,11 all of which are related to the metabolic syndrome. Recently, angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) signaling has been shown to play a significant role in various pathological processes complicating the metabolic syndrome such as angiogenesis and inflammation.12-15 CNV has proven to be an inflammatory disorder depending on intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1,16 monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-117 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).18 We have recently shown that AT1-R-mediated up-regulation of these inflammatory and angiogenic molecules is required for the development of CNV19 ; however, the role of (pro)renin receptor as a trigger to activate tissue RAS in CNV has not been defined. Although we have further shown that tissue RAS promoting retinal inflammation20 and neovascularization21 is activated by nonproteolytic activation of prorenin, it has not been determined whether (pro)renin receptor-mediated intracellular signaling, the other pathway of RAPS, is pathogenic in the eye.
We therefore hypothesize that prorenin binding to its receptor promotes CNV by dually activating tissue RAS and RAS-independent ERK pathway via the receptor. In the present paper, we report the first evidence of significant relationship between RAPS and CNV together with underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms related to inflammation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male C57BL/6J mice (CLEA, Tokyo, Japan) at the age of 6 to 9 weeks, age- and sex-matched AT1-R-deficient mice22 (based on the C57BL/6J strain and donated by Tanabe Seiyaku Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), angiotensinogen (AGT)-deficient mice23 (based on the C57BL/6J strain and purchased from YS Institute Inc, Tochigi, Japan) and Long-Evans rats (SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) were used. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.
Preparation of (Pro)renin Receptor Blocker
To cover the handle region (positions 11–15) of the prorenin molecule, which is the binding site of (pro)renin receptor,24 we designed a decoy peptide, NH2-IPLKKMPS-COOH (positions 11 to 18), as murine (pro)renin receptor blocker (PRRB) and purified it by high performance liquid chromatography, as described previously.3 The specific inhibitory action of PRRB against RAPS was confirmed in our recent in vivo data.3,5 As a negative control for PRRB, we also prepared a control peptide (CP), NH2-MTRLSAE-COOH (positions 30 to 36) with an amino acid sequence outside the handle region.
Induction of Laser-Induced CNV
Laser-induced CNV is widely used as an animal model for neovascular AMD and reflects the pathogenesis of CNV-related inflammation seen in AMD. In this model, new vessels from the choroid invade the subretinal space after photocoagulation. Laser photocoagulation was performed around the optic nerve with the wavelength of 532 nm, the power of 200 mW, the duration of 100 ms and the spot size of 75 µm for mice or 100 µm for rats using a slit lamp delivery system (Novus Spectra; Lumenis, Tokyo, Japan), as described previously.17
Treatment with PRRB, CP, and Losartan
Mice received intraperitoneal injections of vehicle (PBS), CP (1.0 mg/kg), PRRB (1.0 mg/kg), or losartan (2, 20, or 50 mg/kg; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) 1 day before photocoagulation and the treatments were continued daily until the end of the study. The present dose of PRRB is equivalent to that applied to significantly reduce retinal neovascularization in mice.21 As for losartan, the dose of 20 mg/kg was the most potent in inhibiting CNV (data not shown) and used as the maximal-effect dose in the present data.
Quantification of Laser-Induced CNV
One week after laser injury, eyes were enucleated and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Eye cups obtained by removing anterior segments were incubated with 0.5% fluorescein-isothiocyanate-isolectin B4 (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). CNV was visualized with blue argon laser on a confocal microscope (FV1000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Horizontal optical sections of CNV were obtained at every 1-µm step from the surface to the deepest focal plane. The area of CNV-related fluorescence was measured by National Institutes of Health ImageJ (Bethesda, MD). The summation of the whole fluorescent area was used as the volume of CNV, as described previously.17
Quantification of Infiltrating Macrophages
Three days after laser injury, whole-mount retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-choroid complex was incubated with a goat polyclonal antibody against platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31) and a rat polyclonal antibody against F4/80 (Serotec, Oxford, UK). Alexa 488- and Alexa 546-tagged secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were then applied. PECAM-1-stained area of CNV and F4/80-positive macrophages were evaluated, and the volume-adjusted number of macrophages was calculated.
Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Analyses
We isolated total RNA from the RPE-choroid and performed quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR with an ABI Prism 7700 HT Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA); and probes and primers for the rat genes that encode prorenin, (pro)renin receptor, and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), as described previously.5,7,25
Western Blot Analyses
Three days after laser injury, the RPE-choroid complex was carefully isolated and placed into the lysis buffer. After blocking nonspecific binding with 5% skim milk, polyvinylidene fluoride membranes were incubated with a goat polyclonal antibody against angiotensin II (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or a mouse monoclonal antibody against phosphorylated ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), total ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology) or
-tubulin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Membranes were then incubated with biotin-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, West Grove, PA) followed by avidin-biotin complex (Vectastain ABC Elite Kit; Vector Laboratories). Finally the signals were detected through enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Blotting Analysis System; GE Health Care).
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Protein extracts were obtained from the RPE-choroid complex 3 days after photocoagulation. The protein levels of ICAM-1, MCP-1, VEGF, VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1 and VEGFR-2 were determined with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; R&D Systems).
Immunohistochemistry
Three days after photocoagulation, rat eye cups were incubated with a goat anti-rat (pro)renin receptor antibody together with fluorescein-isothiocyanate-isolectin B4 (Vector Laboratories) or a rabbit anti-EMR 1 (corresponding to murine F4/80) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The anti-(pro)renin receptor antibody was raised by using the previously established COS-7 cells producing rat (pro)renin receptor protein.5 Alexa 488- and Alexa 546-tagged secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) were then applied. For immunohistochemical staining of phosphorylated ERK1/2, a goat polyclonal antibody against rat phosphorylated ERK1/2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was applied as the primary antibody.
In Vitro Assays
Murine brain-derived capillary endothelial cells (b-End3) were cultured with Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (Sigma). After 6-hour incubation with tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-
(Sigma, 1 ng/ml) plus losartan (10 µmol/L), or TNF-
plus PRRB (100 µmol/L) and losartan (10 µmol/L), the supernatant and cell lysate were collected for protein analyses, and then the concentration of MCP-1 in the supernatant and ICAM-1, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in the cell lysate were measured by the ELISA kits (R&D Systems). Murine macrophages (RAW264.7) were treated with Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium containing lipopolysaccharide (100 ng/ml) plus losartan (10 µmol/L) or lipopolysaccharide plus PRRB (100 µmol/L) and losartan (10 µmol/L). After 6-hour incubation, supernatant was processed for ELISA analyses for VEGF (R&D Systems).
Statistical Analyses
All results were expressed as mean ± SEM. The values were processed for statistical analyses (Mann-Whitney test). Differences were considered statistically significant when the P values were <0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To elucidate the involvement of prorenin and (pro)renin receptor in the pathogenesis of CNV, we first performed quantitative RT-PCR analyses for prorenin and (pro)renin receptor in the RPE-choroid complex. Prorenin mRNA levels (ratio to GAPDH mRNA) were up-regulated (P < 0.05) in the RPE-choroid of laser-treated rats, compared with age-matched normal controls (Figure 1A)
. In contrast, mRNA levels of (pro)renin receptor showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between laser-treated rats and normal controls (Figure 1B)
. The CNV volume was measured to evaluate the effects of PRRB on the development of CNV. CP treatment did not significantly (P > 0.05) change the CNV volume (501,810 ± 66,820 µm3), compared with vehicle-treated animals (504,411 ± 49,791 µm3) (Figure 1, C and D)
. However, PRRB-treated mice showed a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in the CNV volume (208,355 ± 29,388 µm3), compared with vehicle-treated mice (504,411 ± 49,791 µm3) or CP-treated mice (501,810 ± 66,820 µm3) (Figure 1, C and D)
.
|
As the cellular mechanism in the pathogenesis of CNV, infiltration of inflammatory cells including macrophages plays a critical role. We compared the number of macrophages, which was adjusted by the area of CNV, between mice treated with PRRB versus vehicle. PRRB-treated mice showed a significant decrease in the number of F4/80-positive macrophages, compared with vehicle-treated animals (P < 0.01, 2.84 ± 0.31/10,000 µm3 versus 4.39 ± 0.41/10,000 µm3) (Figure 2, A and B)
. To investigate the effect of PRRB on angiotensin II generation during CNV, we analyzed angiotensin II levels in the RPE-choroid complex. RPE-choroidal levels of angiotensin II were higher (P < 0.01) in animals with CNV than in age-matched normal controls (Figure 2, C and D)
. Application of PRRB significantly suppressed protein levels of angiotensin II in the RPE-choroid (P < 0.05) (Figure 2, C and D)
. To determine whether PRRB affects angiogenic and inflammatory molecules related to the pathogenesis of CNV, protein levels of ICAM-1, MCP-1, VEGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 in the RPE-choroid complex were analyzed by ELISA. RPE-choroidal protein levels of ICAM-1, MCP-1, VEGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 were up-regulated by inducing CNV. Systemic administration of PRRB significantly suppressed protein levels of ICAM-1 (P < 0.01), MCP-1 (P < 0.05), VEGF (P < 0.05), VEGFR-1 (P < 0.05), and VEGFR-2 (P < 0.01) (Figure 2, E–I)
.
|
To clarify the role of RAS-independent intracellular signaling via (pro)renin receptor, we used mice in which RAS was deactivated by pharmacological blockade of AT1-R with losartan or genetic ablation of AT1-R or AGT. Compared with vehicle-treated wild-type animals (504,411 ± 49,791 µm3), these mice exhibited a significant (P < 0.01) reduction of CNV (305,244 ± 37,883 µm3 for losartan treatment, 314,120 ± 34,023 µm3 for AT1-R deficiency, 278,811 ± 30,462 µm3 for AGT deficiency), which was further suppressed by additional PRRB application (212,643 ± 38,779 µm3 for losartan treatment [P < 0.01], 198,206 ± 15,536 µm3 for AT1-R deficiency [P < 0.05], 163,457 ± 23,767 µm3 for AGT deficiency [P < 0.01]) (Figure 3, A and B)
. We further examined the role of RAS-independent intracellular signaling via (pro)renin receptor in macrophage infiltration into CNV. Compared with wild-type animals (4.39 ± 0.41/10,000 µm3), AGT-deficient mice exhibited a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in the number of F4/80-positive macrophages (2.85 ± 0.38/10,000 µm3), which was further attenuated by PRRB treatment (1.89 ± 0.31/10,000 µm3, P < 0.05) (Figure 3, C and D)
.
|
To examine the expression and tissue localization of (pro)renin receptor and phosphorylated ERK1/2, a known downstream pathway via (pro)renin receptor, rat CNV tissues were immunostained with antibodies against (pro)renin receptor and phosphorylated ERK1/2 together with isolectin B4 or an anti-EMR 1 antibody, markers for vascular endothelial cells or macrophages, respectively. The immunohistochemical analyses of rat CNV tissues showed (pro)renin receptor immunoreactivity in isolectin B4-positive endothelial cells (Figure 4A)
and EMR1-positive macrophages (Figure 4B)
, both of which were positive for phosphorylated ERK1/2. We examined the effect of PRRB on the activation of ERK1/2 in the RPE-choroid excised from mice with CNV. The relative ratio of phosphorylated to total ERK1/2 in the RPE-choroid, increased by inducing CNV, was significantly (P < 0.01) suppressed by PRRB treatment (Figure 4, C and D)
, while no significant (P > 0.05) difference was detected in total ERK1/2 protein levels.
|
To further determine whether RAS-independent intracellular signaling via (pro)renin receptor contributes to the activation of ERK1/2 in CNV, phosphorylated ERK1/2 was examined in the RPE-choroid from AT1-R-deficient mice with CNV. PRRB treatment significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed phosphorylated but not total ERK1/2 (Figure 5A)
. Relative phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed by PRRB application, compared with vehicle-treated AT1-R-deficient mice (Figure 5B)
. To examine whether RAS-independent intracellular signaling via (pro)renin receptor contributes to the up-regulation of the inflammatory and angiogenic molecules responsible for CNV (Figure 2, E–I)
, CNV was induced in AT1-R-deficient mice to measure protein levels of ICAM-1, MCP-1, VEGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 in the RPE-choroid. PRRB application to AT1-R-deficient mice with CNV led to significant suppression of MCP-1 (P < 0.01) (Figure 5C)
and VEGF (P < 0.05) (Figure 5D)
, but not ICAM-1, VEGFR-1, or VEGFR-2 (P > 0.05, data not shown), compared with vehicle treatment to AT1-R-deficient mice with CNV. To confirm the in vivo molecular mechanisms mediated by RAS-independent pathway via (pro)renin receptor (Figure 5, C and D)
, we further performed in vitro analyses, using murine cell lines including b-End3 microvascular endothelial cells (Figure 5E)
and RAW264.7 macrophages (Figure 5F)
, both of which were treated by losartan. We analyzed protein levels of ICAM-1, MCP-1, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 inTNF-
-stimulated endothelial cells and of VEGF in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages. In losartan-treated endothelial cells, protein levels of MCP-1 were significantly (P < 0.01) suppressed by the treatment with PRRB (Figure 5E)
. In contrast, no significant difference was detected in protein levels of ICAM-1, VEGFR-1, or VEGFR-2 following PRRB treatment (data not shown). In losartan-treated macrophages, VEGF protein levels were significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed by the treatment with PRRB (Figure 5F)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study further revealed the role of RAS-independent (pro)renin receptor signaling in CNV generation (Figure 3)
. This study is the first to show the involvement of RAPS, (pro)renin receptor-mediated signal transduction and tissue RAS activation, in in vivo angiogenesis as well as in ocular pathogenesis. We recently showed the contribution of (pro)renin receptor signaling to diabetic nephropathy using AT1-R-deficient mice.3
AT1-R-deficient mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes exhibited reduced proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis in the early phase as compared to wild-type diabetes, indicating a significant role of tissue RAS in diabetic nephropathy. Surprisingly, these renal events in AT1-R-deficient diabetes later progressed to the equivalent levels seen in wild-type diabetic mice. The glomerulosclerosis observed in AT1-R-deficient diabetic mice was associated with ERK activation, which was completely blocked together with the phenotype by sustained application of PRRB, suggesting that the redundant pathways of RAPS were involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. In the present study, we administered PRRB to CNV mice receiving the AT1-R blocker losartan or genetically deficient in AT1-R or AGT, and these three different methods for deactivating RAS confirmed the significant role of intracellular signaling via (pro)renin receptor in the development of CNV (Figure 3, A and B)
. The data are compatible with the result of parallel experiments showing that macrophage infiltration into CNV was also suppressed by PRRB in AGT-deficient mice (Figure 3, C and D)
. Importantly, (pro)renin receptor was present in macrophages and vascular endothelial cells, the major cellular components in CNV tissues, together with the activation of ERK 1/2, a known intracellular signaling via (pro)renin receptor (Figure 4, A and B)
. Indeed, in vivo quantitative analyses for ERK 1/2 revealed PRRB-induced suppression of the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, which was enhanced following CNV induction (Figure 4, C and D)
. However, because AT1-R has been shown to mediate CNV generation,19
the data (Figure 4)
could not exclude the possibility of ERK activation via AT1-R as well as (pro)renin receptor, leading us to further perform the following in vivo and in vitro experiments (Figure 5)
to confirm that (pro)renin receptor signaling per se caused the activation of ERK and up-regulation of inflammatory molecules responsible for CNV formation. Importantly, PRRB application to AT1-R-deficient mice with CNV led to significant suppression of ERK activation (Figure 5, A and B)
. Out of the CNV-related molecules, the expression of which was inhibited by PRRB (Figure 2, E–I)
, our in vivo (Figure 5, C and D)
and in vitro (Figure 5, E and F)
data showed that MCP-1 and VEGF were also regulated by (pro)renin receptor signaling per se. These new findings (Figures 3–5)
clarified molecular and cellular mechanisms mediated by RAS-independent intracellular signaling via (pro)renin receptor in CNV generation. In addition to our recent reports3,5,6,25
showing that RAPS contributes to glomerulosclerosis in the kidney and fibrosis in the heart, the present data are the first to show the association of RAPS with inflammation and angiogenesis in the eye.
Although hypertension is a known risk factor predisposing to AMD, there are indeed a large number of normotensive patients with CNV who have the potential risk of hypotension caused by the use of antihypertensive agents including AT1-R blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In contrast, since (pro)renin receptor is present in the major organs but not in the circulation, PRRB does not affect circulatory RAS or systemic blood pressure.5,7 Interestingly, PRRB treatment to CNV was shown to cause not only tissue RAS deactivation but also additional suppression of (pro)renin receptor signaling-mediated expression of MCP-1 and VEGF, the major pathogenic factors responsible for CNV formation. Collectively, inhibition of RAPS with PRRB may prove more useful as a novel therapeutic strategy for CNV than RAS suppression with conventional AT1-R blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
| Footnotes |
|---|
See related Commentary on page 1591
Supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (No. 18791296 to S.S.).
Accepted for publication August 28, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Satofuka, A. Ichihara, N. Nagai, K. Noda, Y. Ozawa, A. Fukamizu, K. Tsubota, H. Itoh, Y. Oike, and S. Ishida (Pro)renin Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction and Tissue Renin-Angiotensin System Contribute to Diabetes-Induced Retinal Inflammation Diabetes, July 1, 2009; 58(7): 1625 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Wilkinson-Berka Prorenin and the (Pro)renin Receptor in Ocular Pathology Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2008; 173(6): 1591 - 1594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |