- Cazares L.H.
- Troyer D.
- Mendrinos S.
- Lance R.A.
- Nyalwidhe J.O.
- Beydoun H.A.
- Clements M.A.
- Drake R.R.
- Semmes O.J.
- Lemaire R.
- Menguellet S.A.
- Stauber J.
- Marchaudon V.
- Lucot J.P.
- Collinet P.
- Farine M.O.
- Vinatier D.
- Day R.
- Ducoroy P.
- Salzet M.
- Fournier I.
- Bauer J.A.
- Chakravarthy A.B.
- Rosenbluth J.M.
- Mi D.
- Seeley E.H.
- De Matos Granja-Ingram N.
- Olivares M.G.
- Kelley M.C.
- Mayer I.A.
- Meszoely I.M.
- Means-Powell J.A.
- Johnson K.N.
- Tsai C.J.
- Ayers G.D.
- Sanders M.E.
- Schneider R.J.
- Formenti S.C.
- Caprioli R.M.
- Pietenpol J.A.
Materials and Methods
Study Population and Tissues
Discovery cohort (n = 63) | Validation cohort (n = 118) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of patients | MALDI imaging m/z signals | No. of patients | Immunohistochemistry antigens | |||||||||
3445 (HNP-1) | 6278 | 8406 (CRIP1) | 8453 | 10098 (S100-A6) | 11353 | 11613 | HNP-1 (m/z 3445) | CRIP1 (m/z 8406) | S100-A6 (m/z 10098) | |||
Sex | 0.257 | 0.348 | 0.953 | 0.383 | 0.002 | 0.579 | 0.951 | 0.448 | 0.092 | 0.259 | ||
Male | 46 | 89 | ||||||||||
Female | 17 | 29 | ||||||||||
Age | 0.114 | 0.220 | 0.159 | 0.564 | 0.039 | 0.290 | 0.947 | 0.009 | 0.152 | 0.678 | ||
Primary tumor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.248 | 0.375 | 0.224 | ||
pT1 | 0 | 15 | ||||||||||
pT2 | 63 | 54 | ||||||||||
pT3 | 0 | 44 | ||||||||||
pT4 | 0 | 5 | ||||||||||
Regional lymph nodes | 0.730 | 0.572 | 0.059 | 0.396 | 0.081 | 0.400 | 0.305 | 0.016 | 0.964 | 0.023 | ||
pN0 | 18 | 36 | ||||||||||
pN1 | 24 | 35 | ||||||||||
pN2 | 16 | 35 | ||||||||||
pN3 | 5 | 9 | ||||||||||
pNx | 0 | 3 | ||||||||||
Distant metastasis | 0.976 | 0.321 | 0.089 | 0.687 | 0.005 | 0.036 | 0.616 | 0.517 | 0.779 | 0.038 | ||
M0 | 54 | 87 | ||||||||||
M1 | 9 | 31 | ||||||||||
Resection status | 0.675 | 0.238 | 0.055 | 0.129 | 0.011 | 0.448 | 0.150 | 0.196 | 0.624 | 0.361 | ||
R0 | 53 | 81 | ||||||||||
R1 | 9 | 26 | ||||||||||
Rx | 1 | 11 | ||||||||||
Grading | 0.389 | 0.685 | 0.720 | 0.389 | 0.227 | 0.033 | 0.104 | 0.168 | 0.388 | 0.018 | ||
G1 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||
G2 | 16 | 36 | ||||||||||
G3 | 47 | 81 | ||||||||||
Overall survival | 0.075 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.022 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.026 | 0.0862 | 0.016 | 0.0766 |
Discovery Cohort
Validation Cohort
MALDI Imaging for Discovery of Survival-Related Proteins
Protein Identification
Validation of Proteins by Immunohistochemistry
Statistical Analysis
Results
MALDI Imaging Reveals Seven Survival-Associated Proteins



Covariable | Hazard ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value |
---|---|---|---|
MALDI imaging | |||
m/z 3445 (HNP-1) | 1.032 | 0.998–1.070 | 0.063 |
Nodal status | 2.304 | 1.382–3.840 | 0.001 |
Distant metastasis | 0.724 | 0.163–3.220 | 0.670 |
Resection status | 1.398 | 0.273–7.160 | 0.690 |
m/z 6278 | 1.332 | 1.088–1.630 | 0.006 |
Nodal status | 2.869 | 1.661–4.960 | 0.000 |
Distant metastasis | 0.661 | 0.165–2.640 | 0.560 |
Resection status | 0.531 | 0.092–3.080 | 0.480 |
m/z 8406 (CRIP1) | 1.458 | 0.970–2.190 | 0.070 |
Nodal status | 2.477 | 1.459–4.210 | 0.001 |
Distant metastasis | 0.521 | 0.109–2.490 | 0.410 |
Resection status | 0.772 | 0.116–5.160 | 0.790 |
m/z 8453 | 3.626 | 1.275–10.31 | 0.016 |
Nodal status | 2.579 | 1.527–4.360 | 0.000 |
Distant metastasis | 0.760 | 0.185–3.130 | 0.700 |
Resection status | 0.643 | 0.121–3.420 | 0.600 |
m/z 10098 (S100-A6) | 1.219 | 1.012–1.470 | 0.037 |
Nodal status | 2.522 | 1.469–4.330 | 0.001 |
Distant metastasis | 0.407 | 0.078–2.130 | 0.290 |
Resection status | 1.042 | 0.171–6.350 | 0.960 |
m/z 11353 | 1.177 | 0.939–1.480 | 0.160 |
Nodal status | 2.091 | 1.231–3.550 | 0.006 |
Distant metastasis | 0.585 | 0.138–2.480 | 0.470 |
Resection status | 1.668 | 0.326–8.530 | 0.540 |
m/z 11613 | 1.694 | 1.082–2.650 | 0.021 |
Nodal status | 2.570 | 1.529–4.320 | 0.000 |
Distant metastasis | 0.584 | 0.121–2.820 | 0.500 |
Resection status | 0.867 | 0.137–5.470 | 0.880 |
Seven-protein signature | 4.031 | 1.691–9.610 | 0.002 |
Nodal status | 2.501 | 1.521–4.110 | 0.000 |
Distant metastasis | 0.725 | 0.183–2.870 | 0.650 |
Resection status | 1.165 | 0.260–5.220 | 0.840 |
Immunohistochemistry | |||
CRIP1 (m/z 8406) | 1.570 | 1.012–2.440 | 0.044 |
Primary tumor | 1.660 | 0.939–2.950 | 0.081 |
Nodal status | 1.670 | 1.045–2.670 | 0.032 |
Distant metastasis | 1.090 | 0.437–2.720 | 0.860 |
Resection status | 1.030 | 0.363–2.950 | 0.950 |
S100-A6 (m/z 10098) | 3.800 | 1.130–12.81 | 0.031 |
Primary tumor | 1.720 | 0.611–4.860 | 0.300 |
Nodal status | 2.190 | 0.865–5.570 | 0.098 |
Distant metastasis | 1.120 | 0.310–4.050 | 0.860 |
Resection status | 1.670 | 0.355–7.830 | 0.520 |
Identification of Three Survival-Related Protein Markers-HNP-1, CRIP1, and S100-A6
- Bauer J.A.
- Chakravarthy A.B.
- Rosenbluth J.M.
- Mi D.
- Seeley E.H.
- De Matos Granja-Ingram N.
- Olivares M.G.
- Kelley M.C.
- Mayer I.A.
- Meszoely I.M.
- Means-Powell J.A.
- Johnson K.N.
- Tsai C.J.
- Ayers G.D.
- Sanders M.E.
- Schneider R.J.
- Formenti S.C.
- Caprioli R.M.
- Pietenpol J.A.
Validation on an Independent Patient Cohort by Immunohistochemistry Confirms the Prognostic Relevance of the Identified Protein Markers
Seven-Protein Signature Predicts Outcome in Patients Independently of Clinical Parameters

Discussion
- Groene J.
- Mansmann U.
- Meister R.
- Staub E.
- Roepcke S.
- Heinze M.
- Klaman I.
- Brummendorf T.
- Hermann K.
- Loddenkemper C.
- Pilarsky C.
- Mann B.
- Adams H.P.
- Buhr H.J.
- Rosenthal A.
- Ma X.J.
- Salunga R.
- Tuggle J.T.
- Gaudet J.
- Enright E.
- McQuary P.
- Payette T.
- Pistone M.
- Stecker K.
- Zhang B.M.
- Zhou Y.X.
- Varnholt H.
- Smith B.
- Gadd M.
- Chatfield E.
- Kessler J.
- Baer T.M.
- Erlander M.G.
- Sgroi D.C.
- Azab B.
- Bhatt V.R.
- Phookan J.
- Murukutla S.
- Kohn N.
- Terjanian T.
- Widmann W.D.
Acknowledgments
Supplementary data
- Supplemental Figure S1
A: Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) plot. Circles in plot represent individual m/z species. Dashed lines delimit the area of random effect. Red circles indicate that higher expression correlates with a higher risk. Inset lists the m/z species together with their individual q-values (indirectly related to the false discovery rate, which was set to a maximum of 10%). B: Correlation coefficients between m/z species. Correlation coefficients were calculated by Spearman's rank correlation. Values above 0.8 were considered highly correlated. Thus, the correlated signals with the lower q-values (m/z 6226, m/z 8418, and m/z 11,655) were excluded from further consideration.
- Supplemental Figure S2
Kaplan-Meier graphs for MALDI imaging m/z species 3445, 6278, 8406, 8453, 10098, 11353, and 11613.
- Supplemental Figure S3
Fragment spectra of HNP-1 identification. Neutrophil defensin 1 was identified with a Mascot score of 109 (P < 0.05). Neutrophil defensin 1 is cleaved into the peptides HNP-1 or HNP-2 (see Uniprot entry: P59665). HNP-1 differs from HNP-1 by the absence of one amino acid residue. Theoretical mass calculations from the resulting peptides identified m/z 3445 as HNP-1 and m/z 3373 as HNP-2.
- Supplemental Figure S4
A: Comparison of seven- and three-signal protein signature. Seven-signal (left) and three-signal (right) protein signatures obtained by MALDI imaging were compared with regard to their prognostic information. Therefore, patients were first clustered on basis of the respective signature (upper panels: see Materials and Methods in main manuscript) and the resulting groups were then compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses (lower panels). Multivariate survival analyses by COX regression were performed in the MALDI imaging data set to assess the prognostic value of the three-signal protein signature in comparison with major clinical parameters (top) and with the seven-signal signature (bottom). Both analyses show that the three-protein signature is sufficient to be a significant indicator for patient survival, and even independent from clinical parameters. However, the full signature adds significant prognostic information.
- Supplemental Figure S5
Known and predicted interactions of S100-A6 (S100A6) with other proteins. This functional protein association network was obtained by searching the STRING online database (http://string-db.org) for the entry “S100A6,” Interestingly, S100-A6 binds directly to proteins such as p53 (TP53) and annexin 2 (ANXA2), which have been extensively described in the context of cancer.
References
- Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.Int J Cancer. 2010; 127: 2893-2917
- Cancer statistics, 2008.CA Cancer J Clin. 2008; 58: 71-96
- The role of surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2010; 101: 687-692
- Prognostic factors in gastric cancer.Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 1651-1664
- Gene expression profile predicts patient survival of gastric cancer after surgical resection.J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 7286-7295
- Expression profiling identifies chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 18 as an independent prognostic indicator in gastric cancer.Gastroenterology. 2004; 127: 457-469
- Gene expression profile towards the prediction of patient survival of gastric cancer.Biomed Pharmacother. 2010; 64: 133-139
- Proteomic applications for the early detection of cancer.Nat Rev Cancer. 2003; 3: 267-275
- Imaging mass spectrometry: a new technology for the analysis of protein expression in mammalian tissues.Nat Med. 2001; 7: 493-496
- MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for direct tissue analysis: a new frontier for molecular histology.Histochem Cell Biol. 2008; 130: 421-434
- Gastric cancer-specific protein profile identified using endoscopic biopsy samples via MALDI mass spectrometry.J Proteome Res. 2010; 9: 4123-4130
- Proteomics in diagnostic pathology: profiling and imaging proteins directly in tissue sections.Am J Pathol. 2004; 165: 1057-1068
- Profiling and imaging proteins in tissue sections by MS.Anal Chem. 2004; 76: 87A-93A
- Imaging mass spectrometry of a specific fragment of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase kinase 2 discriminates cancer from uninvolved prostate tissue.Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 5541-5551
- A novel histology-directed strategy for MALDI-MS tissue profiling that improves throughput and cellular specificity in human breast cancer.Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006; 5: 1975-1983
- Specific MALDI imaging and profiling for biomarker hunting and validation: fragment of the 11S proteasome activator complex.J Proteome Res. 2007; 6: 4127-4134
- Identifying prostate carcinoma by MALDI-imaging.Int J Mol Med. 2007; 20: 155-159
- Proteomic-based prognosis of brain tumor patients using direct-tissue matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry.Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 7674-7681
- Proteomic patterns of tumour subsets in non-small-cell lung cancer.Lancet. 2003; 362: 433-439
- Identification of markers of taxane sensitivity using proteomic and genomic analyses of breast tumors from patients receiving neoadjuvant paclitaxel and radiation.Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 681-690
- IARC Press, Lyon2000: 39-52 International Agency for Research on Cancer: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system.
- Wiley-Liss, New York2002: 59-62 International Union against Cancer: TNM classification of malignant tumours. (German edition).
- The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma.Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965; 64: 31-49
- Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98: 5116-5121
- Classification of HER2 receptor status in breast cancer tissues by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry.J Proteome Res. 2010; 9: 1854-1863
- Survival prediction of gastric cancer by a seven-microRNA signature.Gut. 2010; 59: 579-585
- A comparison of selected mRNA and protein abundances in human liver.Electrophoresis. 1997; 18: 533-537
- Current challenges and future applications for protein maps and post-translational vector maps in proteome projects.Electrophoresis. 1996; 17: 830-838
- Characterization of pepsinogen C as a potential biomarker for gastric cancer using a histo-proteomic approach.J Proteome Res. 2005; 4: 1799-1804
- Identification of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and human neutrophil peptides 1–3 as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer.Br J Cancer. 2009; 101: 295-302
- Upregulated expression of human neutrophil peptides 1, 2 and 3 (HNP 1–3) in colon cancer serum and tumours: a biomarker study.BMC Cancer. 2005; 5: 8
- Overexpression of CRIP in transgenic mice alters cytokine patterns and the immune response.Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 282: E1197-E1203
- Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development.Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6: 24-37
- Identification and rational redesign of peptide ligands to CRIP1, a novel biomarker for cancers.PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4: e1000138
- Nuclear LIM interactor, a rhombotin and LIM homeodomain interacting protein, is expressed early in neuronal development.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93: 11693-11698
- Human cysteine-rich intestinal protein: cDNA cloning and expression of recombinant protein and identification in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Protein Expr Purif. 1997; 9: 379-387
- Regulation of cysteine-rich intestinal protein by dexamethasone in the neonatal rat.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993; 90: 712-715
- Identification of cervical cancer markers by cDNA and tissue microarrays.Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 1927-1935
- Transcriptional census of 36 microdissected colorectal cancers yields a gene signature to distinguish UICC II and III.Int J Cancer. 2006; 119: 1829-1836
- Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 5974-5979
- Characterization of gene expression profiles in intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas.Am J Pathol. 2002; 160: 1745-1754
- Hypomethylation of WNT5A.Oncogene. 2007; 26: 6560-6565
- Human defensins as cancer biomarkers and antitumour molecules.J Proteomics. 2009; 72: 918-927
- Pathobiology of the neutrophil-intestinal epithelial cell interaction: role in carcinogenesis.World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 5790-5800
- Usefulness of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting short- and long-term mortality in breast cancer patients.Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1814-0
- Presence of intratumoral neutrophils is an independent prognostic factor in localized renal cell carcinoma.J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4709-4717
- S100A6—new facts and features.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 390: 1087-1092
- S100A6 binds to annexin 2 in pancreatic cancer cells and promotes pancreatic cancer cell motility.Br J Cancer. 2009; 101: 1145-1154
- S100A6 binds p53 and affects its activity.Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009; 41: 784-790
- Expression of S100A6 and S100A4 in matched samples of human colorectal mucosa, primary colorectal adenocarcinomas and liver metastases.Oncology. 2002; 63: 192-200
- High nuclear S100A6 (Calcyclin) is significantly associated with poor survival in pancreatic cancer patients.Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 3218-3225
- S100A6 overexpression associates with poor prognosis and is epigenetically up-regulated in gastric cancer.Am J Pathol. 2010; 177: 586-597
- Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective.Nature Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 695-709
- Approaching MALDI molecular imaging for clinical proteomic research: current state and fields of application.Expert Rev Proteomics. 2010; 7: 927-941
- Deciphering protein molecular signatures in cancer tissues to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 10642-10645
Article Info
Publication History
Footnotes
Supported by grants from the Deutsche Krebshilfe (No. 108096 ), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Nos. 01EZ0803 and 0315508A ), and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ( SFB 824 TP B1 and TP Z2 ).
Supplemental material for this article can be found at http://ajp.amjapthol.org or at doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.08.032.
Identification
Copyright
User License
Elsevier user license |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
Not Permitted
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy